As a middle aged female I would stop and look at this cover on
the newsstand. Bright, bold colors with
what strikes me as flames which implies heat & Fire makes the cover
jump. Of course, I’m drawn to
Arnold. A muscle bound super hero of my
youth, ahhh yesssss Arnolddd…. Sighhhhhh….
This is a fitness magazine geared towards body builders who want
to chisel and tone their bodies. This
magazine is typically read by males, although there are some female body
builders. Utilizing Arnold as their “cover
girl,” supports their primary article in this issue, “20 inch arms.” Arnold was known for his massive shoulders
and arms.
This magazine provides tips and tricks to develop your physique
and it alludes to action packed insides and encouragement as to the amount of
content by referring to the page number on the cover.
The cover conveys power, strength, endurance, brutish
reality. If help is needed, don’t call
in the calvary, call Arnold!
I
remember seeing this cover and thinking really?
Arnold? Wow, you’ve changed. The softer colors and graphics as well as the
inset cover image cause the magazine to appeal to a softer man or even a female
audience. The content is geared toward
the intellectual mindset as opposed to the physical and brutish of the previous
piece.
I
believe the strategic placement of Arnold’s hand and his wedding ring are
creating a connection to individuals with family values and a connection to
others. This magazine cover showcases a
man who was known for his physique and strength for more than 20 years and in
this image he looks normal, just like the next guy. The use of a dark suit with a power tie is
intentional. His personal strength and
potential power (be it physical or political) are alluded to in the large hand.
This
magazine is geared towards provide confidence in the educated readership, which
is predominantly male that this historically physically powerfull male as the
same values (marriage, family) as they do, that he is a serious politician
(power suit & tie) and that he will be there for the reader (the “Uncle Sam”
pose. His smile and facial expression
show him to be a non-aggressive, happy individual which instills confidence.
Activity #3
There
is an incredible contrast between the two covers which represent two very
different points of view.
I
believe I covered the majority of these items in the deconstructs, but to
summarize. In showing Arnold in two
separate settings there is a very clear comparison on how altering the tone of
the color through the use of graphics, color, and content affects the
perception of the exact same person.
I
am also struck by the use of Arnold on the cover of Muscle & Fitness in
2003, which is the same time that a much milder, and sedate Arnold is on
Esquire. This is an intentional
marketing ploy and may have been orchestrated by Arnold’s PR team to broaden
his readership and following. Typically,
those who read one of these magazines would not read the other.
It
is the simple things that show a difference as well, the script of the second
title shows a certain feminity, while the bold., block style of the first
reinforces power and strength. Bold
state of content vs. a sublt use of text with the addition of a feminine graphic.
It
would be interesting to make minor modification to each piece to see if it
would be possible to balance out the message and exude the exact same message,
mjust by alter the colors and the fonts.
Both of these magazine covers appeared one month apart from each other during the year Arnold ran for Governor of California! Your instincts (or media literacy skills) that told you the Esquire cover was an attempt to appeal to a wider audience was right on! I think it is amazing how media techniques can be used to create images of people that convey such vastly different values and lifestyles! Actually I think it is kind of creepy. Most people will claim to know media manipulates the truth but I don't think most people, and especially young people, know the extent to which the manipulation occurs.
ReplyDelete